I added "IMPALA_LZO_BRANCH=2.x" to the properties file generated in
cherrypick-2.x-and-test....

[image: image.png]

On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 11:36 PM Quanlong Huang <huangquanl...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thank Tim and Fredy's help!
>
> However, I still find some downstream Jenkins jobs not using the same
> IMPALA_LZO_BRANCH value. There're two failures due to this:
>
> 1) I ran gerrit-verify-dryrun for patch set 12429
> with IMPALA_LZO_BRANCH=2.x. The job is
> https://jenkins.impala.io/job/gerrit-verify-dryrun/3760
> This downstream job ubuntu-16.04-build-only still used master branch of
> Impala-lzo thus failed:
>  -  ubuntu-16.04-build-only #5336
> https://jenkins.impala.io/job/ubuntu-16.04-build-only/5336/
>
> Looks like this job does not use IMPALA_LZO_BRANCH so not switch branch of
> Impala-lzo. I think we should set IMPALA_LZO_BRANCH in impala-config.sh and
> use it in buildall.sh.
>
> 2) I ran cherrypick-2.x-and-test. The job is
> https://jenkins.impala.io/job/cherrypick-2.x-and-test/638/
> The problematic downstream jobs:
>  - ubuntu-16.04-from-scratch #4470
> https://jenkins.impala.io/job/ubuntu-16.04-from-scratch/4470/
>  - ubuntu-16.04-from-scratch #4471
> https://jenkins.impala.io/job/ubuntu-16.04-from-scratch/4471/
>
> Looks like the IMPALA_LZO_BRANCH is not set so they still use the default
> value (master).
> I don't have the permission to modify the job configs. Could anyone help to
> have a look?
>
> Thanks,
> Quanlong
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 1:32 PM Quanlong Huang <huangquanl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Then branch-2.x needs this again: https://gerrit.cloudera.org/c/12339/.
> > Could anyone have a look at this? I encountered a build error at
> > https://gerrit.cloudera.org/c/12429/ due to this.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Quanlong
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 1:15 AM Philip Zeyliger <phi...@cloudera.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks! (And Jim suggested the same thing.)
> >>
> >> My apologies for the churn. What I didn't realize is that
> >> https://jenkins.impala.io/job/parallel-all-tests/build takes a
> >> "IMPALA_LZO_BRANCH" parameter. I had foolishly assumed that the branch
> >> logic was in
> >>
> >>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=impala.git;a=blob;f=bin/bootstrap_system.sh;h=cb869ffe79f3c35cf45b2f962a472274319d746c;hb=HEAD#l378
> >> ,
> >> but it's actually passed through in the Jenkins job. Yesterday Lars and
> I
> >> piped some of the stuff through to
> >> https://jenkins.impala.io/job/gerrit-verify-dryrun/build?delay=0sec as
> >> well.
> >>
> >> Again, apologies for causing the churn. I should have worked it out in
> >> more
> >> detail. Please continue to let me know if things are still broken.
> >>
> >> -- Philip
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 1:00 AM Tim Armstrong <tarmstr...@cloudera.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I just changed the default to master, because that would make sense.
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:56 AM Quanlong Huang <
> huangquanl...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Oh, I thought the default is master. Just abandoned my patch since
> >> it's
> >> > > redundant. There's a relative patch for impala-3.x to use the master
> >> > > branch:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/impala/commit/365e35a36f142532044d8a34cbb87646bf9cb240
> >> > >
> >> > > On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 4:40 AM Jim Apple <jbap...@cloudera.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Do you want to change default branch to master, rather than
> >> cdh5-trunk?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > https://help.github.com/articles/setting-the-default-branch/
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 3:51 PM Philip Zeyliger <
> phi...@cloudera.com
> >> >
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > "cdh5-trunk" was that branch, but I also pushed it to 2.x, for a
> >> bit
> >> > > more
> >> > > > > consistency.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > -- Philip
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 3:44 PM Quanlong Huang <
> >> > huangquanl...@gmail.com
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Hi Philip,
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Thanks for your kindly reminder! Could you help to create a
> tag
> >> in
> >> > > the
> >> > > > > > cloudera/Impala-lzo project to point to the previous commit?
> >> Then
> >> > > > > > it's convenient for branch-2.x to point to a pined version.
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > > > Quanlong
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 5:33 AM Philip Zeyliger <
> >> > phi...@cloudera.com>
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Hi Fredy,
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > I think you need to rebase your change onto mine. I've just
> >> done
> >> > so
> >> > > > by
> >> > > > > > > clicking the button, and we'll see.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > -- Philip
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 12:24 PM Fredy Wijaya <
> >> > fwij...@cloudera.com
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > gerrit-code-review-checks seems a bit unhappy with the
> >> change,
> >> > > e.g.
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://jenkins.impala.io/job/gerrit-code-review-checks/1963/artifact/https%3A%5E%5Ejenkins.impala.io%5Ejob%5Eclang-tidy-ub1604%5E5041%5E/*view*/
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > + ./buildall.sh -skiptests -tidy -so -noclean
> >> > > > > > > > + echo 'tidy build failed; See /home/ubuntu/tidylog.txt
> for
> >> > full
> >> > > > tidy
> >> > > > > > > > build output. Guess:'
> >> > > > > > > > tidy build failed; See /home/ubuntu/tidylog.txt for full
> >> tidy
> >> > > build
> >> > > > > > > > output. Guess:
> >> > > > > > > > + grep ': error: ' /home/ubuntu/tidylog.txt
> >> > > > > > > > /home/ubuntu/Impala-lzo/hdfs-lzo-text-scanner.cc:140:17:
> >> error:
> >> > > > > > > > ‘class impala::HdfsScanNodeBase’ has no member named
> >> > > > > > > > ‘UpdateRemainingScanRangeSubmissions’
> >> > > > > > > > /home/ubuntu/Impala-lzo/hdfs-lzo-text-scanner.cc:168:14:
> >> error:
> >> > > > > > > > ‘class impala::HdfsScanNodeBase’ has no member named
> >> > > > > > > > ‘UpdateRemainingScanRangeSubmissions’
> >> > > > > > > > /home/ubuntu/Impala-lzo/hdfs-lzo-text-scanner.cc:169:59:
> >> error:
> >> > > no
> >> > > > > > > > matching function for call to
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> ‘impala::HdfsScanNodeBase::AddDiskIoRanges(std::vector<impala::io::ScanRange*>&)’
> >> > > > > > > > /home/ubuntu/Impala-lzo/hdfs-lzo-text-scanner.cc:200:49:
> >> error:
> >> > > no
> >> > > > > > > > matching function for call to
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> ‘impala::HdfsScanNodeBase::AddDiskIoRanges(std::vector<impala::io::ScanRange*>)’
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 1:20 PM Philip Zeyliger <
> >> > > > phi...@cloudera.com>
> >> > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > Hi folks,
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > I just pushed
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=impala.git;a=commit;h=a8e30506aafef14646d95a56fb87cf7c28d259d6
> >> > > > > > > > > and
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/cloudera/impala-lzo/commit/dccb1be88a5e237b06ae69cd99b048a38d9f024b
> >> > > > > > > > > to tackle IMPALA-7980. If you're working on master, and
> >> you
> >> > > have
> >> > > > > > > > > ../Impala-lzo checked out, you'll need to pull that
> repo.
> >> > > There's
> >> > > > > > also
> >> > > > > > > a
> >> > > > > > > > > divergence now for Impala-lzo between branches, so if
> >> you're
> >> > > > still
> >> > > > > > > > working
> >> > > > > > > > > on 2.x (say), you'll need to figure out how to manage
> >> that.
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > Please let me know if you run into issues; I'll be happy
> >> to
> >> > > help.
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > -- Philip
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to