Filed https://issues.cloudera.org/browse/IMPALA-4079

On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote:

> Agreed that the lint script is a bit hacky, but it has very few false
> positives, mostly false negatives. We run that lint script on every patch
> in kudu. (Though tuned to disable a few of the more nit picky rules)
>
> Todd
>
> On Sep 2, 2016 10:24 AM, "Jim Apple" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I'm in favor of that. It's also worth mentioning that .clang-format is
> > about what we do going forward, and not carte blanche to send patches
> > that reformat whitespace in files written before we had .clang-format.
> >
> > Some of the style guide, of course, refers to non-whitespace based
> > rules. Google has a linter script that tries to find divergence form
> > the standard, but I am dubious of it:
> >
> > https://github.com/google/styleguide/blob/gh-pages/cpplint/cpplint.py
> >
> > It has known places where it is inaccurate, and it doesn't understand the
> > AST.
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Tim Armstrong <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > I'm not sure that the pros and cons are that enlightening. May make
> sense
> > > to just remove them - not sure what others think.
> > >
> > > For formatting, I think we should consider leaning more on
> clang-format.
> > > The discussion around clang-format seemed to be going that direction.
> > >
> > > E.g. maybe the rule should be something like "Our .clang-format is the
> > > source of truth for how to deal with whitespace, except when
> > clang-format's
> > > output greatly diverges from the existing code style or common sense.
> In
> > > that case, we should update the .clang-format file."
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Tim Armstrong <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Yes, several things are completely wrong. E.g. we never use c-style
> > casts.
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Jim Apple <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I left a comment on the page - I'm not sure how much these reflect
> our
> > >>> actual current practice.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Lars Volker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> > After some confusion in reviews about how to format code I moved
> our
> > >>> > internal C++ Style Guide wiki page to the Apache wiki and updated
> all
> > >>> links
> > >>> > in it. You can find it here:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?
> > >>> pageId=65868536
> > >>> >
> > >>> > At some point in time someone seems to have started a list of pro
> and
> > >>> cons,
> > >>> > some of which are worded rather negative. Do we want to revisit
> those
> > >>> > comments or the style guide even?
> > >>> >
> > >>> > I'm looking forward to any feedback. Thanks, Lars
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
>

Reply via email to