Hi Julian,

I will submit the PR about updating RELEASE_NOTES to rel/0.8.

Just one question, some PRs are not associated with Jira issues, is "listing 
them in the bottom of the corresponding list without a Jira number" ok?

for example:

Bug Fixes
---------

IOTDB-7     OpenFileNumUtilTest failed
fix time zone bug in different region         (<---this one does not match a 
Jira issue)


Best,
--
Jialin Qiao
School of Software, Tsinghua University

乔嘉林
清华大学 软件学院

> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: "Julian Feinauer" <j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>
> 发送时间: 2019-07-16 15:50:15 (星期二)
> 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" <dev@iotdb.apache.org>
> 抄送: 
> 主题: Re: Volunteer as Release Manager for release 0.8
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> so I created a release branch now called rel/0.8, see [1].
> Master branch is now set to the new development version 0.9.0-SNAPSHOT.
> 
> This means, that all PRs should be rebased (which should be no problem in 99% 
> of cases).
> 
> So all changes we do regarding the release should go into rel/0.8.
> If we fix  bugs there they should be merged into rel/0.8 BUT also 
> cherry-picked into master.
> 
> @ Jialin: if you assist with the RELEASE_NOTES file you should do it in 
> rel/0.8.
> 
> So all PRs keep going to master and all future development and only things 
> regarding the release will go into the rel/0.8 branch.
> If we do major changes there they will be merged back to master regularily 
> and we keep the branch open to support "minor" or "hotfix" releases.
> 
> Best
> Julian
> 
> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/tree/rel/0.8
> 
> Am 16.07.19, 09:43 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" <j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>:
> 
>     Yes, I can spin up a release branch now and then everybody who does 
> things for "release stabilization" should work there or point the PRs to 
> there (like updating release notes and stuff).
>     
>     Am 16.07.19, 09:32 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" <saint...@gmail.com>:
>     
>         Hi,
>         
>         So, do we need to confirm the source codes and create a release 
> branch now?
>         
>         Best,
>         -----------------------------------
>         Xiangdong Huang
>         School of Software, Tsinghua University
>         
>          黄向东
>         清华大学 软件学院
>         
>         
>         Julian Feinauer <j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> 于2019年7月16日周二 
> 下午12:54写道:
>         
>         > Hey Jialin,
>         >
>         > that is a very kind offer!
>         > Some time ago I already created a "RELEASE_NOTES" File (in the 
> root) and
>         > added in what was there up till then.
>         > But as this was like 2 or 3 months ago it needs to be overworked.
>         > So feel free to extend the file.
>         >
>         > Julian
>         >
>         > Am 16.07.19, 04:32 schrieb "Jialin Qiao" 
> <qj...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn>:
>         >
>         >     Hi,
>         >
>         >     It's very exciting that we are going to release the first 
> version.
>         >
>         >     PR #245, #232 have been merged successfully. Therefore, we 
> could start
>         > to release.
>         >
>         >     If needed, I will traverse the PRs and Issues to give a changes
>         > (major) list from 0.7.0 to 0.8.0.
>         >
>         >     Best,
>         >     --
>         >     Jialin Qiao
>         >     School of Software, Tsinghua University
>         >
>         >     乔嘉林
>         >     清华大学 软件学院
>         >
>         >     > -----原始邮件-----
>         >     > 发件人: "Julian Feinauer" <j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>
>         >     > 发送时间: 2019-07-15 21:48:54 (星期一)
>         >     > 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org" <dev@iotdb.apache.org>
>         >     > 抄送:
>         >     > 主题: Re: Volunteer as Release Manager for release 0.8
>         >     >
>         >     > Hey Xiangdong,
>         >     >
>         >     > I also think that the "changelog" will be huge.
>         >     > But I'm unsure if we have to write everything as "change" 
> because
>         > this is the "first" release with regards to the ASF so I'm unsure 
> if we
>         > would point to 0.7 as "previous" release.
>         >     >
>         >     > @cdutz, @jmclean what is your point on that, how do other 
> podlings
>         > handle that?
>         >     >
>         >     > Julian
>         >     >
>         >     > Am 15.07.19, 15:45 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" 
> <saint...@gmail.com>:
>         >     >
>         >     >     Hi,
>         >     >
>         >     >     Should we solve CVE problems in this release?
>         >     >
>         >     >     Maven reports many CVE problem caused by dependencies...
>         >     >
>         >     >     For example,
>         >     >     * Detected 1 vulnerable components:
>         > org.apache.thrift:libthrift:jar:0.9.3
>         >     >     * Detected 1 vulnerable components:
>         > ch.qos.logback:logback-core:jar:1.1.11
>         >     >
>         >     >     It is easy to fix them by upgrading their version. 
> However,
>         > current master
>         >     >     branch works in stable, and if we upgrade the version of
>         > dependencies,
>         >     >     maybe we need more time to test.
>         >     >
>         >     >     Therefore, I'd like to ignore them in this release....
>         >     >
>         >     >     Best,
>         >     >     -----------------------------------
>         >     >     Xiangdong Huang
>         >     >     School of Software, Tsinghua University
>         >     >
>         >     >      黄向东
>         >     >     清华大学 软件学院
>         >     >
>         >     >
>         >     >     Xiangdong Huang <saint...@gmail.com> 于2019年7月15日周一 
> 下午9:26写道:
>         >     >
>         >     >     > Hi,
>         >     >     >
>         >     >     > First, I think  PR #245, #232 can go into 0.8. The 
> codes have
>         > been
>         >     >     > reviewed and approved. Hope the authors can finish 
> their tests
>         > and merge
>         >     >     > them tonight.
>         >     >     >
>         >     >     > There are many many changes comparing with 0.7. And, 
> there are
>         > many data
>         >     >     > files and configurations that conflict with 0.7. We 
> need to
>         > review recently
>         >     >     > issues and PRs to filter them out and form the Changes 
> file.
>         >     >     >
>         >     >     > Best,
>         >     >     > -----------------------------------
>         >     >     > Xiangdong Huang
>         >     >     > School of Software, Tsinghua University
>         >     >     >
>         >     >     >  黄向东
>         >     >     > 清华大学 软件学院
>         >     >     >
>         >     >     >
>         >     >     > Julian Feinauer <j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> 
> 于2019年7月15日周一
>         > 下午8:46写道:
>         >     >     >
>         >     >     >> Hi all,
>         >     >     >>
>         >     >     >> first, thanks again to the PPMC to invite me as a 
> Comitter.
>         >     >     >> As I have all necessary rights now I can hereby offer 
> to do
>         > the release
>         >     >     >> manager for the release 0.8 which will be the first 
> official
>         > ASF release of
>         >     >     >> IoTDB.
>         >     >     >>
>         >     >     >> As suggested in the other Thread, I think it would be 
> good to
>         > start off
>         >     >     >> with the release soon just to learn the process 
> together and
>         > do all
>         >     >     >> necessary checking and clearance.
>         >     >     >> For that I am very happy that we have Chris and Justin 
> on the
>         > team who
>         >     >     >> are very experienced and sharp eyed.
>         >     >     >>
>         >     >     >> Are there any issues that you think should go into 0.8
>         > (feature) wise
>         >     >     >> before spinning up a release branch?
>         >     >     >> I will also open a “Release” in jira, so that we can 
> assign
>         > and track the
>         >     >     >> tickets there.
>         >     >     >>
>         >     >     >> Julian
>         >     >     >>
>         >     >     >
>         >     >
>         >     >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         
>     
>     
> 

Reply via email to