> Will multiple lines lead to messy printing under multiple threads. I read the related PR. These lines are written by calling writer.write() once and the write method is thread-safety...
But I may agree with you if putting them in one line is friendly for analysis. Best, ----------------------------------- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Dawei Liu <atoi...@163.com> 于2020年6月28日周日 下午4:20写道： > Hi， > > > I have a question. Why not print all the information on the same line? > Will multiple lines lead to messy printing under multiple threads. > > > Example: > > > Query Id: 2 - Start time: 2020-06-23 20:02:22.205 > Query Id: 6 - Start time: 2020-06-23 20:02:22.205 > > Query Id: 6 - Query Statement: select * from root > Query Id: 2 - Query Statement: select * from root > Query Id: 2 - Number of series paths: 3 > Query Id: 2 - Number of tsfiles: 2 > Query Id: 2 - Number of sequence files: 2 > Query Id: 6 - Number of series paths: 3 > Query Id: 2 - Number of unsequence files: 0 > Query Id: 2 - Number of chunks: 3 > Query Id: 2 - Average size of chunks: 4113 > > > > > > Best, > ————————————————— > Dawei Liu > On 06/28/2020 15:51，Xiangdong Huang<saint...@gmail.com> wrote： > I suggest formatting the log for being easily analyzed in the future. > > Yes, it will be better if we can use `grep` or some other Linux commands > to get a structured format. > > Best, > ----------------------------------- > Xiangdong Huang > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 黄向东 > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > Jialin Qiao <qj...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> 于2020年6月28日周日 上午11:31写道： > > Hi, > > [1] is ok. I suggest formatting the log for being easily analyzed in the > future. > > Thanks, > -- > Jialin Qiao > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 乔嘉林 > 清华大学 软件学院 > > -----原始邮件----- > 发件人: "孙泽嵩" <sz...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> > 发送时间: 2020-06-24 00:45:23 (星期三) > 收件人: dev@iotdb.apache.org > 抄送: > 主题: Re: [VOTE] Vote for formats of printing performance tracing log file: > > Hi Xiangwei, > > I vote for [1] since it’s more clear and in alignment. > > > Best, > ----------------------------------- > Zesong Sun > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 孙泽嵩 > 清华大学 软件学院 > > 2020年6月23日 23:31，Xiangdong Huang <saint...@gmail.com> 写道： > > Hi, > > Also vote for the first format. > > By the way, can we add more info, e.g., > > - the ratio of reading from (metadata and data) cache > - how many chunks that just the headers are read. > > Best, > ----------------------------------- > Xiangdong Huang > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 黄向东 > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > Xiangwei Wei <wxw19981...@gmail.com> 于2020年6月23日周二 下午9:23写道： > > Hi, guys > > Sorry, I put the vote content in another email. I will add it here. > > > Hi, guys > > I'd like to get a little advice from you. > > The following are three formats of printing performance tracing log > file: > > [1] > ----------------------------- > Query Id: 2 - Start time: 2020-06-23 20:02:22.205 > Query Id: 2 - Query Statement: select * from root > Query Id: 2 - Number of series paths: 3 > Query Id: 2 - Number of tsfiles: 2 > Query Id: 2 - Number of sequence files: 2 > Query Id: 2 - Number of unsequence files: 0 > Query Id: 2 - Number of chunks: 3 > Query Id: 2 - Average size of chunks: 4113 > > [2] > ----------------------------- > Query Id: 2 - Start time: 2020-06-23 19:38:35.109 | Query Statement: > select > * from root | Number of series paths: 3 > Query Id: 2 - Number of tsfiles: 2 | Number of sequence files: 2 | > Number > of unsequence files: 0 > Query Id: 2 - Number of chunks: 3 | Average size of chunks: 4113 > > [3] > ----------------------------- > Query Id: 2 - Start time: 2020-06-23 19:38:35.109, Query Statement: > select > * from root, Number of series paths: 3 > Query Id: 2 - Number of tsfiles: 2, Number of sequence files: 2, > Number of > unsequence files: 0 > Query Id: 2 - Number of chunks: 3, Average size of chunks: 4113 > > Which do you prefer? Any other suggestions are OK. > > Please leave your opinion. > > 田原 <tian...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> 于2020年6月23日周二 下午9:08写道： > > Hi, > > xiangwei > > I prefer the first one. > > vote for [1]. > > Best, > --------------- > Yuan Tian > > > > > > > -- > Best, > Xiangwei Wei > > > >
