Hi, So we will keep BigEndian, right?
Best, ----------------------------------- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer <[email protected]> 于2021年9月28日周二 下午6:47写道： > > Big +1 for fixed Endianness! > > I think a C implementation would also be beneficial for something like a > sqlite interface (see my thread here > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd4d0296e0fef9c1c822f605f641d829047e0932429499a5e05667b8e%40%3Cdev.iotdb.apache.org%3E) > as it could be wrapped to whatever language we like basically (again > sqlite...). > > Best > Julian > > Von: Giorgio Zoppi <[email protected]> > Datum: Montag, 27. September 2021 um 13:06 > An: dev <[email protected]> > Betreff: Re: Endianess. > Hello IOTDBers, > Chris I agree with you, everything shall be Network Byte Order( > https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=hosts-network-byte-order) by > the first writing. Thank you. I will look at your C code for review, > The first stage is to support natively TsFile. At this moment we've just > unmolded code however looking at Apache Arrow codebase is useful for the > progress. After the ts file we'll look together at a server, my idea is to > have in the long term a lower latency product that scales better than Java > ones (iotdb-native). But for the moment it's just a dream, so baby steps > and hard work as usual. > Thank you! > > Best Regards, > Giorgio.
