Hi, BigEndian +1，no changing
Best > 2021年9月29日 下午3:32，Yuan Tian <[email protected]> 写道： > > Hi, > > I also prefer not to change the current mode. > > BigEndian +1 > > ----------------------- > Yuan Tian > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 8:39 AM Xiangdong Huang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> So we will keep BigEndian, right? >> >> Best, >> ----------------------------------- >> Xiangdong Huang >> School of Software, Tsinghua University >> >> 黄向东 >> 清华大学 软件学院 >> >> Julian Feinauer <[email protected]> 于2021年9月28日周二 下午6:47写道： >>> >>> Big +1 for fixed Endianness! >>> >>> I think a C implementation would also be beneficial for something like a >> sqlite interface (see my thread here >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd4d0296e0fef9c1c822f605f641d829047e0932429499a5e05667b8e%40%3Cdev.iotdb.apache.org%3E) >> as it could be wrapped to whatever language we like basically (again >> sqlite...). >>> >>> Best >>> Julian >>> >>> Von: Giorgio Zoppi <[email protected]> >>> Datum: Montag, 27. September 2021 um 13:06 >>> An: dev <[email protected]> >>> Betreff: Re: Endianess. >>> Hello IOTDBers, >>> Chris I agree with you, everything shall be Network Byte Order( >>> https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/zos/2.4.0?topic=hosts-network-byte-order) by >>> the first writing. Thank you. I will look at your C code for review, >>> The first stage is to support natively TsFile. At this moment we've just >>> unmolded code however looking at Apache Arrow codebase is useful for the >>> progress. After the ts file we'll look together at a server, my idea is >> to >>> have in the long term a lower latency product that scales better than >> Java >>> ones (iotdb-native). But for the moment it's just a dream, so baby steps >>> and hard work as usual. >>> Thank you! >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Giorgio. >>
