thanks Skywalking community. i feel should be apache/iotdb-skywalking-storage.skywalking be not a required module for iotdb,separate from apache/iotdb.
---Original--- From: "Xiangdong Huang"<saint...@gmail.com> Date: Fri, May 13, 2022 17:37 PM To: "dev"<dev@iotdb.apache.org>; Subject: maintain the IoTDB-Skywalking plugin codes Hi all, Skywalking community is discussing about only keeping self-implemented storage layer. IMO, I think it is not a bad decision to remove 3rd-part implementataion from skywalking's main repo. Because we can decide which version of skywalking we can maintain according to the community developers' time. However, IoTDB-skywalking integration has its meaning and we should keep to maintain the integration. The discussion is, where to put the integration to? a new code repo like: apache/iotdb-skywalking-storage? or into IoTDB's repo like apache/iotdb/skywalking? [1] https://github.com/apache/skywalking/discussions/9059 Best, ----------------------------------- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院