+1 for apache/iotdb-skywalking-storage ————————————————— Jialin Qiao Apache IoTDB PMC
HW-Chao Wang <576749...@qq.com.invalid> 于2022年5月13日周五 21:09写道: > thanks Skywalking community. i feel should be > apache/iotdb-skywalking-storage.skywalking be not a required module for > iotdb,separate from apache/iotdb. > > > > ---Original--- > From: "Xiangdong Huang"<saint...@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, May 13, 2022 17:37 PM > To: "dev"<dev@iotdb.apache.org>; > Subject: maintain the IoTDB-Skywalking plugin codes > > > Hi all, > > Skywalking community is discussing about only keeping self-implemented > storage layer. > > IMO, I think it is not a bad decision to remove 3rd-part implementataion > from skywalking's main repo. Because we can decide which version of > skywalking we can maintain according to the community developers' time. > However, IoTDB-skywalking integration has its meaning and we should keep to > maintain the integration. > > The discussion is, where to put the integration to? > > a new code repo like: apache/iotdb-skywalking-storage? > or into IoTDB's repo like apache/iotdb/skywalking? > > [1] https://github.com/apache/skywalking/discussions/9059 > > Best, > ----------------------------------- > Xiangdong Huang > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 黄向东 > 清华大学 软件学院