Just so long as you are happy that no-one will think that the > isis-inmemory-objectstore -> isis-core-objectstore
is the core object store.. or somehow core to all objectstores. Otherwise, go with the previous suggestion: >> isis-inmemory-objectstore -> isis-core-objectstore-inmemory But, I suppose that with a suitable description in the class comment, it should be easy to make it clear that "isis-core-objectstore" is a simple implementation and must be replaced in a production environment, then that name is fine. Kevin
