[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13978772#comment-13978772
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on ISIS-421:
------------------------------------------------------

Commit 964e252b968b8b23041a8ec68f8f79bcb22d5f60 in isis's branch 
refs/heads/master from [~danhaywood]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=isis.git;h=964e252 ]

ISIS-421: fixes to in-memory objectstore to make RO TCK tests more reliable...

... key on ObjectSpecId not on ObjectSpecification, since the latter can 
sometimes be discarded.

Specifically, this was occurring as a result of a prior test which attempted to 
get a non-existent property (returning a 404); as a side-effect the ObjectSpec 
was discarded, meaning subsequent tests could find no instances of the class.

In addition
- extended IsisWebServerRule to allow webapp to be discarded (after mutating 
change)
- copied in boilerplate for all "TODO" tests that are likely to mutate state 
(and so will need to use this new "discardWebApp()" functionality).


> Write TCK tests for Restful Objects viewer
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ISIS-421
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-421
>             Project: Isis
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Viewer: RestfulObjects
>    Affects Versions: viewer-restfulobjects-2.0.0
>            Reporter: Dan Haywood
>            Assignee: Dan Haywood
>             Fix For: viewer-restfulobjects-2.3.0
>
>         Attachments: 
> Get_thenResponseHeaders_ContentLength_ok-RO-TCK-test.patch, ISIS-421.patch, 
> ISIS-421_Get_thenRepresentation_ok.patch, 
> ISIS-421_Get_thenResponseCode_200_TODO.patch, 
> ISIS-421_Get_whenQueryArg_xRoDomainModel_ok.patch
>
>
> Implement TCK tests for RO viewer, as found in: 
> https://github.com/apache/isis/tree/master/component/viewer/restfulobjects/tck/src/test/java/org/apache/isis/viewer/restfulobjects/tck



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to