Is not this too concrete? Could it be specified by means of a more generic mechanism?
I find too specific to have an annotation property for a concrete set of icons. There are others currently also used (like icons8, etc) that could be also referred. Perhaps a mechanism a bit more generic could instead be used? Or at least an annotation field name not referring on its name the "font awesome" initials? HTH, Oscar > El 12/12/2014, a las 11:13, Dan Haywood (JIRA) <[email protected]> escribió: > > Dan Haywood created ISIS-974: > -------------------------------- > > Summary: Provide the ability to associate font-awesome icons with > properties > Key: ISIS-974 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-974 > Project: Isis > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Core, Viewer: Wicket > Affects Versions: core-1.7.0, viewer-wicket-1.7.0 > Reporter: Dan Haywood > Assignee: Dan Haywood > Priority: Minor > Fix For: viewer-wicket-1.9.0, core-1.9.0 > > > ie as per http://fortawesome.github.io/Font-Awesome/examples/#bootstrap > > using: > > @PropertyLayout( > cssClassFa="fa fa-fw fa-envelope-o" > ) > public String getEmailAddress() { ... } > > etc. > > > > -- > This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA > (v6.3.4#6332)
