Agreed for safeRegisterNamespace but on this issue please see my other mail: there are a couple of question to answer
On 8/4/06, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, On 8/4/06, Nicolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1/ I disagree. It is a better programming practice not to launch exception > for this kind of issues. Besides, there should be a way to check if the > namespace is already or not registered. Maybe something to add to the next > version of JCR? What do you think? Agreed, but adding a custom method for checking namespace existence increases the coupling between the backup tool and Jackrabbit. Actually, you may want to use the safeRegisterNamespace() method I added a few months ago. Proposing to add that in JSR 283 is also an option, though I'm not sure if the use case is critical enough to warrant inclusion in the standard. > 3/4/5/ I will delete the backup code + restore code. Maybe I should just > comment it, in case we need in later. What do you think? Sounds good. BR, Jukka Zitting -- Yukatan - http://yukatan.fi/ - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Software craftsmanship, JCR consulting, and Java development
-- a+ Nico my blog! http://www.deviant-abstraction.net !!
