Hi, On Jan 21, 2008 12:30 PM, Ard Schrijvers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jukka Zitting wrote: > > Instead of the current node id's, the search index would need > > to contain the paths of the indexed nodes. Thus the > > //[EMAIL PROTECTED]:uuid='...'] query (or its equivalent) executed by > > getNodeByUUID() would return the path that can be used to > > access the node. > > Doesn't this imply that moving a node would need re-indexing all its > child nodes because of changed paths, making a move a very expensive > operation?
It should be fairly easy to optimize this by just updating the changed path references in the search index for any nodes that haven't been changed during the move. BR, Jukka Zitting
