Hi, On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Julian Reschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, to make this useful, a client would need to re-read the property value > before, checking it's still the same as earlier on? Is that the proposal?
Re-reading won't help as another session could still make changes before the save. My suggestion is that the client should use an explicit lock if it needs such synchronization. BR, Jukka Zitting
