Re: Concurrent modifications

[Julian Reschke]

David Nuescheler wrote:
 I indeed get the expected exception, but not for
  n1.getProp
  n2.getProp

  n1.setProp
  n1.save

  n2.setProp
  n2.save

 ...which I hoped for.

i think it would be totally legitimate for a content repository to either
throw or not... personally, i would not support a test case in the tck
that test for either behavior.

Yes, that is correct -- this is not about JCR compliance, but about what 
we expect *Jackrabbit* to do.

BR, Julian