Hi everybody, we also decided to use jcrom as an ocm for our new content management system. We think that it's a very lightweight solution to map object to a content repository and we welcome it if it would be integrated in the jackrabbit core.
>From our development experiences we now, that jcrom has still some problems in the following fields: - management of acls - transaction support - versioning But I think it this ocm solution would be a benefit to every jackrabbit user. Regards Christoph Jukka Zitting wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:31 PM, ogg<oli.ga...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I'm finding that I have less and less time to maintain my open source JCR >> object mapping solution, JCROM (http://jcrom.org). >> >> Therefore I'm wondering whether there is any interest from you Jackrabbit >> people to take over the code base and possibly integrate it into your >> Jackrabbit OCM? > > Sounds like a good idea! :-) > > However, are there JCROM users or developers who'd be willing to step > up to fix issues and work on new features in case you don't have time > to do that anymore? I'd rather not to adopt a codebase that nobody is > working on. > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JCROM-and-Jackrabbit-OCM-tp25255760p25641695.html Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
