Hi. I for one have not used OCM. It seems to complicated and I feel that I loose control. No offence intendend :-) As for JCROM, I really like it. Have used it for some time, but have had doubt since it has not been very well maintained. It is simple and lightweight - just as I like it. Will be happy to contribute to further development of JCROM or a mix between the two.
Regards, Sten Roger Sandvik On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Christophe Lombart < christophe.lomb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Concerning Jackrabbit OCM,I am (unfortunately) the only committer for > the project. > For the moment, I have no time to work on it. That's the reason why > the code didn't change for a long time. > > Maybe I'm wrong but I think it is almost the same for JCROM. In a > such situation, it should be nice to know : > Who are using OCM or JCROM in the Jackrabbit community ? > Who want to contribute to OCM or JCROM (this is certainly the most > important question ) ? > Will we plan to keep both projects ? > > Christophe > > 2009/9/29 Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitt...@gmail.com>: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Jason Thrasher <ja...@coachthrasher.com> > wrote: > >> What's the status of JCROM -> Jackrabbit idea, and OCM in Jackrabbit in > >> general? It's not clear from reading the website, or the lists. > > > > There seems to be general interest to bringing JCROM to Jackrabbit, > > and so far I see nobody objecting to the idea. > > > > To move forward on this, we need IP clearance [1] on JCROM and a > > Jackrabbit VOTE on accepting the codebase. I'm happy to support the > > process for all the parts that require an ASF officer, but it would be > > great if we had volunteers for things like filling in the IP clearance > > template [2]. > > > > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html > > [2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html > > > > BR, > > > > Jukka Zitting > > >
