Hi, On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Thomas Müller <thomas.muel...@day.com> wrote: > This would be after the fact and wouldn't work to validate that > changes are correct (to verify added / changed nodes don't violate > node type constraints). Also it wouldn't work for security.
I'd make node type constraints and security checks the responsibility of the client who commits the transaction. I don't see the point of doing such steps after the transaction has already been committed. BR, Jukka Zitting
