Hi, IIRC this would be inline with another discussion in the [jr3] arena, to have a common low-level persistence upon which all the other parts of Jackrabbit requiring some form of persistence (except logging and configuration, probably) build.
In this context, I would think it to be a good idea to consolidate this data in the common persistence. On 12.03.2010 10:22, Thomas Müller wrote: > Currently the journal (cluster journal and event journal) is stored > using a separate storage mechanism. > > I think it should be stored using the 'normal' storage mechanism. What do you mean by "'normal' storage mechanism" ? Is it nodes and properties, in which case I fear further performance issues in this area. Is it the common persistence layer, then definitely +1 Regards Felix > > Advantages: > - Simplifies the architecture (specially for clustering) > - Events and node data are in the same transaction, which improves > reliability and performance > > Regards, > Thomas >
