On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:22, Thomas Müller <thomas.muel...@day.com> wrote: > Currently the journal (cluster journal and event journal) is stored > using a separate storage mechanism. > > I think it should be stored using the 'normal' storage mechanism. > > Advantages: > - Simplifies the architecture (specially for clustering) > - Events and node data are in the same transaction, which improves > reliability and performance
Generally I am in favor of that, but I have one question: wasn't the journal added to be separate from the persistence manager implementation and allow for a "fast" exchange of master/slave node information and latest revisions? Or is this separation not useful? Regards, Alex -- Alexander Klimetschek alexander.klimetsc...@day.com
