On 2012-01-23 11:43, Felix Meschberger wrote:
...
I am not sure, whether this proposal does not open a can of worms: Consider
using a node for child nodes whose retrieval should be ordered by insertion
order. This is currently guaranteed by switching on ordered child nodes on the
parent node, right ?
So, applications using this will always use ordered nodes and thus suffer from
performance again ... not good.
...
How is "ordered by insertion order" and "allowing manual re-ordering"
different from an application point of view?
...
Best regards, Julia
