On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Bart van der Schans <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Oak has the advantage and so we'll go with that. I'll set up the new >>> mailing list, issue tracker and svn space in a moment. >> >> The issue tracker is now available at >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK and the svn space is at >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/ (I'll set up a Git >> mirror later today). The oak-dev@ mailing list should follow up >> shortly, see INFRA-4514 [1]. > > I'm all in favor of having a nice and fancy working name, a separate > jira and svn location, but are we sure we want to setup separate > mailing lists as well? I'm afraid this might split up the jr community > or in the best case everybody from the jr community subscribes to the > new lists as well, which makes having the lists a bit superfluous. > > How do other people feel about this?
I'd prefer to just use [oak] in the subject prefix and stick to the current dev list. Also see Bertrand's recent post : 'Stefano’s Mazzocchi’s Busy List Pattern' Regards Ard [1] http://grep.codeconsult.ch/2011/12/06/stefanos-mazzocchis-busy-list-pattern/ > > Regards, > > Bart
