Then it all narrows down to Apache jclouds. Since the podling approval had the same name, I do not think a vote is necessary. But if you suspect others might have opinions, I can start the vote thread and summarize the results. Since this is a podling decision to retain the approved name, IPMC vetting should not be required. So just a 72 hours latency.
Suresh On May 8, 2013, at 4:31 PM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> wrote: > jclouds has more often been all lowercase than anything else, historically. > > > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Ignasi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> I don't know if there is a official name for jclouds (I've seen it >> written in many ways), but I always liked the lowercase version. >> >> On 8 May 2013 22:25, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote: >>> My only wonder is there a religious feeing about use of lower case j? >> and for that matter also c? During the incubator bootstrap, I have seen >> the natural temptation to refer as Apache Jclouds or Apache JClouds. Apache >> jclouds is also fine just wondering. >>> >>> Suresh >>> On May 8, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, team. >>>> >>>> I'm pretty sure we are interested in continuing use of the name jclouds. >>>> That said, we should probably formalize this before I go about trademark >>>> assignment to ASF. Can someone lead the vote on this? >>>> >>>> -A >>> >>
