Cheers. I'll wait 72 hours and if no objection send whatever is necessary wrt trademark to the right people.
-A On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote: > Then it all narrows down to Apache jclouds. Since the podling approval had > the same name, I do not think a vote is necessary. But if you suspect > others might have opinions, I can start the vote thread and summarize the > results. Since this is a podling decision to retain the approved name, IPMC > vetting should not be required. So just a 72 hours latency. > > Suresh > > On May 8, 2013, at 4:31 PM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> wrote: > > > jclouds has more often been all lowercase than anything else, > historically. > > > > > > On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Ignasi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> I don't know if there is a official name for jclouds (I've seen it > >> written in many ways), but I always liked the lowercase version. > >> > >> On 8 May 2013 22:25, Suresh Marru <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> My only wonder is there a religious feeing about use of lower case j? > >> and for that matter also c? During the incubator bootstrap, I have seen > >> the natural temptation to refer as Apache Jclouds or Apache JClouds. > Apache > >> jclouds is also fine just wondering. > >>> > >>> Suresh > >>> On May 8, 2013, at 3:13 PM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi, team. > >>>> > >>>> I'm pretty sure we are interested in continuing use of the name > jclouds. > >>>> That said, we should probably formalize this before I go about > trademark > >>>> assignment to ASF. Can someone lead the vote on this? > >>>> > >>>> -A > >>> > >> > >
