Whenever someone wants to add a new provider, we always suggest to copy the latest provider, so the archetype is no used in practice nor updated.
+1 to remove those. On 16 May 2013 20:54, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, team. > > Many of you know that our archetypes folder hasn't worked in a long time, > and our assemblies project has not been used in at least a year. I'd like > to remove these vs maintain headers etc in them. If we wanted an > archetype, we'd need to largely recreate it anyway. > > Any against? > > -A
