https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-54 I'll open a pull on this.
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Ignasi <[email protected]> wrote: > Whenever someone wants to add a new provider, we always suggest to > copy the latest provider, so the archetype is no used in practice nor > updated. > > +1 to remove those. > > On 16 May 2013 20:54, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, team. > > > > Many of you know that our archetypes folder hasn't worked in a long time, > > and our assemblies project has not been used in at least a year. I'd > like > > to remove these vs maintain headers etc in them. If we wanted an > > archetype, we'd need to largely recreate it anyway. > > > > Any against? > > > > -A >
