Yeah, Apache humbles me with email, it forwards to one email account so when i hit reply i reply from that one when i can send from @apache.org... I can't tell what's getting modded and not. I suck at email apparently, I don't know why you people trust me to commit software.
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Andrew Bayer <[email protected]>wrote: > learn2notdoublereply. =) > > A. > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Matt Stephenson <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Ignasi, > > I can take jclouds-labs-google, I should probably learn it. > > > > > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Ignasi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > Jeremy, thanks! You have > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-62 assigned. Would you > > > be able to have a look at it? If not, no problem; I'm going to take > > > jclouds-labs-google, and can do the rest too. > > > > > > On 21 May 2013 22:19, Matt Stephenson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > FYI : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6295 > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Andrew Bayer < > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > >> I should be fine - I've done this before with Bigtop and Whirr, > which > > is > > > >> why I volunteered to RM our first release. =) I'll try to put > > together a > > > >> checklist of pre-release tasks we've got to get done on Thursday, > and > > > then > > > >> a release candidate evaluation checklist as well. > > > >> > > > >> The wiki isn't set up yet, right? I don't think Adrian's opened a > > ticket > > > >> for that... > > > >> > > > >> A. > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Matt Stephenson < > [email protected] > > > >> >wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Awesome, is there anything anyone can help you with? It sounds > > like a > > > >> > sizeable amount of work for one person. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 8:53 AM, Andrew Bayer < > > [email protected] > > > >> > >wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > So overall, I'd like to try to get a first RC ready for review > by > > > >> > everyone > > > >> > > by Wednesday (May 29th) next week - I get home very late > Wednesday > > > >> night > > > >> > > this week, but have a bunch of work to deal with for the rest of > > the > > > >> > week, > > > >> > > so the additional time would be handy. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > After we get a first RC, we (the project and our mentors) should > > > review > > > >> > > everything for a couple days, with the goal of getting the > > > for-realz RC > > > >> > up > > > >> > > for an official vote by the PPMC (us) and IPMC (the incubator > PMC) > > > by > > > >> end > > > >> > > of day on that Friday, May 31st. With the standard 72 hour > > > (excluding > > > >> > > weekends) voting window, that'll give us a shot at having an > > > official > > > >> ASF > > > >> > > release of 1.6.1-incubating done by end of day the following > > > Wednesday, > > > >> > > June 5th. But odds are that there'll be flaws in the RC we > submit > > to > > > >> the > > > >> > > IPMC that'll need correcting, with some iteration/new votes, > etc. > > > >> That's > > > >> > > why I'm targeting Friday May 31st for the start of the vote - > that > > > >> gives > > > >> > me > > > >> > > an extra 48 hours over the weekend to deal with nitpicking. =) > > > >> > > > > > >> > > How does that sound to everyone? I know it's not quite as fast > as > > we > > > >> > might > > > >> > > like, but I'd rather be safe than sorry, and I want to make > sure I > > > have > > > >> > the > > > >> > > time to do this release properly *and* document the hell out of > > > >> > everything > > > >> > > so that, say, Andrew Philips can handle the next one without > > > needing me > > > >> > to > > > >> > > do much of anything. =) > > > >> > > > > > >> > > A. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >
