On 26/04/13 04:34, Ying Jiang wrote:
Hi Andy,
Thanks for your explanations! I've got the idea of jena-spatial. I can
create it following the way of jena-text, with 2 implementations of
"nearby" and "within" at least. It's OK for this part.
This is interesting:
http://beta.data.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/ontology/spatialrelations/
other spatial relationships (regions not just points) but less that
full GeoSPARQL.
As to the Fuseki task, it does not aim at jena-spatial, is it? Do you
mean the other Jena GSoC projects [1] [2]? I've checked the source
code of Fuseki UI pages. Could you tell me what's the technology, e.g.
"sparql.tpl"? What's "tpl"?
No - the Fuseki tasks are not jena-spatial related. It should be
possible to have a Fuseki server with spatial support by simply adding
it to the build/classpath.
The .tpl files are Apache Velocity. Usually that's .vm but I thought
making the external name tied to the internal technology was a bad idea
for a server side technology (may, in theory, want to change the
templating system - they were JSPs).
Andy
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-420
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-427
Best regards,
Ying Jiang
