+1
On 8/3/13 7:31 AM, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote: >On 02/08/13 19:28, Stephen Allen wrote: >> +1 >> >> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Rob Vesse <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi All >>> >>> As Cindy McNullen's thread on the users list demonstrated ( >>> >>>http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jena-users/201308.mbox/%3cD5F68 >>>[email protected]%3e) >>> some users did not get the message about SDB deprecation. I have >>>updated >>> the SDB page of the website to note our decision about deprecation and >>> recommend usage of TDB instead. >>> >>> This is currently just in staging - >>> http://jena.staging.apache.org/documentation/sdb/index.html >>> >>> Please review the text I added and adjust as deemed appropriate. >>> >>> Rob >>> >> > >I reworded it to emphasis "maintenance only" and "not actively >developed" as takne for the mail message. > >"deprecation" is a shorthand for us but someone may read in different >ways. We do not currently state it will be removed, only it might be. >(And there are developers familiar with it ... all too familiar!) > >In italics: > >----------- > Use of SDB for new applications is not recommended. > >This component is "maintenance only". > >TDB is faster, more scalable and better supported than SDB. >----------- > > Andy >
