On 09/09/14 21:12, Damian Steer wrote:
On 9 Sep 2014, at 14:59, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:
On 09/09/14 14:39, Damian Steer wrote:
On 9 Sep 2014, at 12:50, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:
Claude +1'ed and I'm OK with this plan.
Is everyone else OK with it? (please "+1/0/-1")
If so, I'll call a VOTE for moving trunk.
1/ Move the code to git
2/ Repackage com.hp.hpl.jena -> org.apache.jena
3/ Declare jena-3.0-alpha-1 (not a release - just POM version set.).
4/ Starting making changes
(like RDF 1.1 details - invalidates persistent data).
To be clear, is the plan to branch for 3.0? Will there be parallel 2.x work?
Damian
In my mind, two branches. (names?)
Realistically, there is going to be overlap of 3.0 and 2.12.x -
jena-3.0-alpha-1 is not a replacement for the main project.
As expected, but best to check.
+1
+1
Dave
