[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14200661#comment-14200661
 ] 

Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-808:
------------------------------------

Either works : patches or pull requests and since there are patches here, lets' 
start with those.  I've assigned myself to this JIRA to recognize there is work 
to be done although it might take a few days before I can handle it (any other 
committer - feel free to jump in).  If it slips too long, do ping me to check.

> De-deprecate Difference, Delta, and Intersection
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-808
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-808
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: Jena
>    Affects Versions: Jena 2.12.1
>         Environment: Any
>            Reporter: Gert van Valkenhoef
>            Assignee: Andy Seaborne
>         Attachments: 0001-Give-test-more-accurate-name.patch, 
> 0002-Refactor-graph.compose.Delta-and-add-tests.patch, 
> 0003-Add-tests-for-graph.compose.Difference.patch, 
> 0004-Use-assertIsomorphic-instead-of-assertEquivalent.patch, 
> 0005-Add-unit-tests-for-Intersection.patch, 
> 0006-Add-unit-tests-for-Union.patch
>
>
> In JENA-59 it was mentioned that the Difference, Delta, and Intersection 
> classes were deprecated due to a lack of tests. I am using these in an 
> implementation of the Event Sourcing pattern (see 
> http://github.com/gertvv/jena-es/).
> I am willing to implement additional tests if this helps remove the 
> deprecations and make them a stable part of Jena. Is this something you would 
> consider?
> Can you give concrete examples of what is currently missing and/or provide an 
> example of a similar but well-tested class? I had a look at the tests for 
> Union (which is not deprecated), but they don't appear to be any more 
> comprehensive.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to