[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14204635#comment-14204635
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-808:
------------------------------------------------------

Commit bc6c1fb7a7c5b38120b6bdfdd5ef97d17ce3b82e in jena's branch 
refs/heads/eliminate-assignments from [~andy.seaborne]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;h=bc6c1fb ]

JENA-808 : Upgrades for composit graphs.  Remove deprecation.

> De-deprecate Difference, Delta, and Intersection
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-808
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-808
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: Jena
>    Affects Versions: Jena 2.12.1
>         Environment: Any
>            Reporter: Gert van Valkenhoef
>            Assignee: Andy Seaborne
>             Fix For: Jena 2.12.2
>
>         Attachments: 0001-Give-test-more-accurate-name.patch, 
> 0002-Refactor-graph.compose.Delta-and-add-tests.patch, 
> 0003-Add-tests-for-graph.compose.Difference.patch, 
> 0004-Use-assertIsomorphic-instead-of-assertEquivalent.patch, 
> 0005-Add-unit-tests-for-Intersection.patch, 
> 0006-Add-unit-tests-for-Union.patch
>
>
> In JENA-59 it was mentioned that the Difference, Delta, and Intersection 
> classes were deprecated due to a lack of tests. I am using these in an 
> implementation of the Event Sourcing pattern (see 
> http://github.com/gertvv/jena-es/).
> I am willing to implement additional tests if this helps remove the 
> deprecations and make them a stable part of Jena. Is this something you would 
> consider?
> Can you give concrete examples of what is currently missing and/or provide an 
> example of a similar but well-tested class? I had a look at the tests for 
> Union (which is not deprecated), but they don't appear to be any more 
> comprehensive.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to