Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/94#discussion_r44025441
  
    --- Diff: 
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/core/assembler/InMemDatasetAssembler.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
    +package org.apache.jena.sparql.core.assembler;
    +
    +import static org.apache.jena.assembler.JA.MemoryDataset;
    +import static org.apache.jena.assembler.JA.data;
    +import static org.apache.jena.query.DatasetFactory.createTxnMem;
    +import static org.apache.jena.riot.RDFDataMgr.loadModel;
    +import static org.apache.jena.riot.RDFDataMgr.read;
    +import static 
org.apache.jena.sparql.core.assembler.AssemblerUtils.setContext;
    +import static 
org.apache.jena.sparql.core.assembler.DatasetAssemblerVocab.*;
    +import static org.apache.jena.sparql.util.FmtUtils.stringForRDFNode;
    +import static org.apache.jena.sparql.util.graph.GraphUtils.*;
    +
    +import java.util.function.Predicate;
    +
    +import org.apache.jena.assembler.Assembler;
    +import org.apache.jena.assembler.Mode;
    +import org.apache.jena.assembler.assemblers.AssemblerBase;
    +import org.apache.jena.query.Dataset;
    +import org.apache.jena.rdf.model.Model;
    +import org.apache.jena.rdf.model.RDFNode;
    +import org.apache.jena.rdf.model.Resource;
    +
    +/**
    + * An {@link Assembler} that creates in-memory {@link Dataset}s.
    + *
    + */
    +public class InMemDatasetAssembler extends AssemblerBase {
    +
    +   @Override
    +   public Dataset open(final Assembler assembler, final Resource root, 
final Mode mode) {
    +           checkType(root, MemoryDataset);
    +           final Dataset dataset = createTxnMem();
    +           setContext(root, dataset.getContext());
    +           // Default graph can be defined with ja:graph or ja:defaultGraph
    +           final Resource defaultGraphDef = 
root.hasProperty(pDefaultGraph) ? getResourceValue(root,
    +                           pDefaultGraph) : root.hasProperty(pGraph) ? 
getResourceValue(root, pGraph) : null;
    +           if (defaultGraphDef != null) 
dataset.setDefaultModel(retrieve(defaultGraphDef, assembler, mode));
    +           // or with ja:data
    +           final Predicate<RDFNode> isResource = n -> {
    +                   if (n.isResource()) return true;
    +                   throw new DatasetAssemblerException(root, "Not a 
resource: " + stringForRDFNode(n));
    +           };
    +           multiValue(root, data).parallelStream().filter(isResource)
    +                           .forEach(defaultGraphNode -> read(dataset, 
defaultGraphNode.asResource().getURI()));
    +
    --- End diff --
    
    The hope from using `parallelStream` was indeed to queue on the lock, but 
get _reading_ going in parallel. IOW, reading could require network access or 
filesystem access that could very well be parallelized. But I take your point 
about the order of error messages. That could be really terribly confusing. 
I'll pull out the parallelization.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to