[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14998654#comment-14998654 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-624: ------------------------------------- Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/94#discussion_r44411038 --- Diff: jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/query/DatasetFactory.java --- @@ -16,253 +16,226 @@ * limitations under the License. */ -package org.apache.jena.query ; - --- End diff -- See your comment [here](https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jena-dev/201510.mbox/%3C5610F36D.8090602%40apache.org%3E) about "other clearing up of DatasetFactory ...", although I'm not sure why Git created the diff in this confusing way. > Develop a new in-memory RDF Dataset implementation > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: JENA-624 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-624 > Project: Apache Jena > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Andy Seaborne > Assignee: A. Soroka > Labels: gsoc, gsoc2015, java, linked_data, rdf > > The current (Jan 2014) Jena in-memory dataset uses a general purpose > container that works for any storage technology for graphs together with > in-memory graphs. > This project would develop a new implementation design specifically for RDF > datasets (triples and quads) and efficient SPARQL execution, for example, > using multi-core parallel operations and/or multi-version concurrent > datastructures to maximise true parallel operation. > This is a system project suitable for someone interested in datatbase > implementation, datastructure design and implementation, operating systems or > distributed systems. > Note that TDB can operate in-memory using a simulated disk with > copy-in/copy-out semantics for disk-level operations. It is for faithful > testing TDB infrastructure and is not designed performance, general in-memory > use or use at scale. While lesson may be learnt from that system, TDB > in-memory is not the answer here. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)