[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1138?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15141344#comment-15141344
 ] 

A. Soroka commented on JENA-1138:
---------------------------------

Yeah, that's why I offered the option of just bumping the heap to the user 
above. It's up to you to tell me how urgent it is to tune this down. If we're 
comfortable just saying, "The new impl is hungrier and in order to use it, you 
need more heap." then that's obvsiouly easy for me! *grin*

> java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-1138
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1138
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Cmd line tools
>    Affects Versions: Jena 3.0.1
>         Environment: Oracle JDK 1.8.0, Windows 7 64bit
>            Reporter: Giovanni Mels
>              Labels: performance
>         Attachments: sample-data.zip
>
>
> Since 3.0.1 we get {{java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded}} 
> exceptions when using the {{sparql}} command line tool, even on relative 
> small datasets (~1.6 million triples).
> The issue occurs when the dataset is loaded in memory, so before the actual 
> query execution. 
> {code}
> sparql --query empty.rq --data sample-data.ttl
> {code}
> Where {{empty.rq}} contains:
> {noformat}
> SELECT * WHERE {}
> {noformat}
> This query takes ~20 seconds using Jena 2.13.0 and Jena 3.0.0, it fails with 
> 3.0.1 after ~4 minutes with {{java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit 
> exceeded}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to