I will have to look into that I guess since I am frequent user of spatial data.
why not go to 7.5? was there an incompatibility? On Thu 29. Nov 2018 at 16:53, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > Jena 3.1.0 would be around the end of the year. I'd like to make use of > Greg's GeoSPARQL project the "headline" item for the release and to > retire jena-spatial in 3.10.0 as an indication of this. > > Because retirement is a new process for the project, I'm sending this > first 3.10.0 message quite early to give us discussion time. > > == Retirements > > We have talked about this before but not actually done anything. See > separate thread for discussion on retirement process and for the first > modules: > > jena-spatial > jena-fuseki1 > jena-csv > > == Headlines > > JENA-664 : GeoSPARQL support > > I'd like to make use of Greg's GeoSPARQL project the "headline" item for > the release and to retire jena-spatial in 3.10.0 as an indication of this. > > JENA-1621 : Lucene upgrade to 7.4 > May need to reload lucene indexes. > (e.g. the lucene index was create originally with Lucene v5.x (prior > Jena 3.3.0). See Lucene upgrade tool. > https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_4/indexupgrader-tool.html > > JENA-1623 : Fuseki security > JENA-1627 : HTTP support > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1623 > http://jena.staging.apache.org/documentation/fuseki2/data-access-control > > == JIRA: > > 31 currently. > > https://s.apache.org/jena-3.10.0-jira > > == Updates > > Only plugins. JENA-1624 > > surefire : 2.21.0 -> 2.22.1 (+ SUREFIRE-1588) > compiler : 3.7.0 -> 3.8.0 > shade : 3.1.0 -> 3.2.0 > > Andy > -- --- Marco Neumann KONA
