[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16940803#comment-16940803
 ] 

Claude Warren commented on JENA-1704:
-------------------------------------

My reading of 
https://docs.sonarqube.org/latest/architecture/architecture-integration/ is 
that we would have to run SonarScanner as part of the build process for the 
sonar service ( SonarQube Server  and  SonarQube Database) to report it. 

We could do this as part of the site processing and just add site processing to 
the nightly build.  I think this would give us the speed we like for 
development, a nightly or on-demand report of the state of the code base as 
well as SonarQube reports.

I could be wrong about all of the above.

> Enable Apache Sonar reports
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-1704
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1704
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Build
>            Reporter: Adam Soroka
>            Assignee: Adam Soroka
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> Apache offers a Sonar service at [https://builds.apache.org/analysis.] We 
> should take advantage of it in a non-intrusive way. Enabling Sonar analysis 
> must not annoy anyone working on the codebase or make development less 
> pleasant, so it must be done carefully.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to