[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17395505#comment-17395505
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1948:
-------------------------------------
Hi Filip, good to hear from you.
I don't think there is anything needed that missing from Titanium. At the
moment, its only a rather basic reader (minimal lines of code!).
The use case has been Jena user working with W3C [Web of Things (WoT) Thing
Description 1.1|https://www.w3.org/TR/wot-thing-description11/] data which has
a JSON-LD 1.1 context.
([~acoburn] may be able to say more about Inrrupt/Solid's usage.)
The interesting area is on writing RDF as nice looking JSON-LD. Pretty printing
RDF is more work than reading and JSON-LD creates the expectation of nice JSON
in a form specific to the application domain, and so that means exposing the
unique features of JSON-LD (framing etc).
Using the Titanium APIs direct work for Java application writers, but for
Fuseki (the SPARQL server), the interface is HTTP and users are not writing
Java code.
> Consider using Titanium library for JSON-LD 1.1 support
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-1948
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1948
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: JSON-LD, RIOT
> Reporter: Didac
> Priority: Major
> Labels: First
>
> Since there is finally a [JSON-LD 1.1 recommendation
> release|https://www.w3.org/TR/json-ld11/] and Json-LD java is not fully
> supporting JSON-LD 1.1 (plus it seems to be looking for maintainers) maybe is
> time to take a look to the other project out there that supports JSON-LD 11
> in Java: [https://github.com/filip26/titanium-json-ld]
> The coverage is pretty good. I haven't seen any performance comparison
> though. And the project is very recent, but worth taking a look.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
