[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17453942#comment-17453942
]
Hemant Tiwari commented on JENA-2204:
-------------------------------------
Thank you Andy for help.
_"Show the directory listing with sizes." :_ I have attached my TDB2 index
data with LUBM dataset.
Jena Index :
--------------------------
Jena Version : 4.0.0
JVM : 64 Bit
Triple Count : 100k
Original Size : 150MB
Size after Compact : 140 MB
Size after Zipping : 1.5 MB
--------------------------
How can I go 5x to 10x lower on storage consumption ?
> Storage required by TDB2 is much higher than TDB1, How to Fix ?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-2204
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-2204
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Question
> Reporter: Hemant Tiwari
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUBM-TDB2-Data.7z
>
>
> The storage required by TDB2 is much higher than TDB1
> For 100k statements - TDB1 takes about 90 MB, while TDB2 is taking ~ close to
> 1 GB.
> Why is there such a difference and is there any solution available to reduce
> the storage size?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
