On 23 January 2012 16:29, Mark Collin <m...@ardescosolutions.com> wrote:
> I'm in the process of simplifying it right now.
>
> The plan is that the only thing you will need to supply in the future is
> test files (obviously in a mavenised directory structure).

With the stand-alone (and Ant) installation, it's easy for users to
update the properties files if they need to.
Will that be possible with the plugin?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 23 January 2012 15:35
> To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Properties files in mavenised artifacts
>
> On 23 January 2012 15:05, Mark Collin <m...@ardescosolutions.com> wrote:
>> That's what I am seeing, I was also expecting the following:
>>
>> saveservice.properties
>> upgrade.properties
>> system.properties
>> jmeter.properties
>> user.properties
>
> Oops, should be fixed now.
>
> Tried the JMeter Maven plugin, and it requires quite a lot of additional set
> up (creating work dirs etc.).
>
> Not easy to use compared with JMeter scripts or the JMeter Ant task (see
> extras/build.xml)
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 23 January 2012 14:57
>> To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Properties files in mavenised artifacts
>>
>> On 23 January 2012 14:46, Mark Collin <m...@ardescosolutions.com> wrote:
>>> I'm able to pull the artifacts in and use them again, but I can't see
>>> any properties files in the ApacheJMeter_config jar.
>>
>> Just downloaded it, and I get:
>>
>> $ jar -tvf ApacheJMeter_config-2.6-20120123.135339-1.jar
>>     0 Mon Jan 23 13:50:32 GMT 2012 META-INF/
>>   373 Mon Jan 23 13:50:30 GMT 2012 META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
>>   172 Sat Jan 21 17:08:48 GMT 2012 META-INF/NOTICE
>>  11560 Sat Jan 21 17:08:48 GMT 2012 META-INF/LICENSE
>>     0 Mon Jan 23 01:39:32 GMT 2012 bin/
>>  1435 Sat Apr 05 02:49:46 BST 2008 bin/BeanShellAssertion.bshrc
>>  2079 Fri Apr 17 11:29:10 BST 2009 bin/BeanShellFunction.bshrc
>>  1232 Sat Apr 05 02:50:08 BST 2008 bin/BeanShellListeners.bshrc
>>  2105 Sat Sep 17 16:40:04 BST 2011 bin/BeanShellSampler.bshrc
>>  1406 Tue Dec 14 17:33:02 GMT 2010 bin/hc.parameters
>>  1563 Fri Dec 10 02:29:52 GMT 2010 bin/httpclient.parameters
>>  1801 Fri Jan 28 15:04:14 GMT 2011 bin/log4j.conf
>>  5781 Fri Dec 16 10:57:22 GMT 2011 bin/logkit.xml
>>  1324 Wed Aug 05 23:42:30 BST 2009 bin/proxyserver.jks
>>  1022 Tue Apr 08 12:36:12 BST 2008 bin/users.dtd
>>  2365 Tue Apr 08 12:36:14 BST 2008 bin/users.xml
>>
>>> I'm testing it by building this:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/Ronnie76er/jmeter-maven-plugin
>>
>> OK, thanks, if that is not too time-consuming to set up I'll try it out.
>>
>>> If that builds and successfully creates the package I'm using it to
>>> run a couple of JMeter tests.
>>>
>>> The above currently has copies of the properties files to enable it
>>> to run until they are available in maven artifacts.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 23 January 2012 14:23
>>> To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Properties files in mavenised artifacts
>>>
>>> On 23 January 2012 14:14, Mark Collin <m...@ardescosolutions.com> wrote:
>>>> Unfortunately that's what it looks like :(
>>>
>>> I've uploaded another version which creates a _config jar.
>>>
>>> Can you try that?
>>>
>>> Also, how are you testing it?
>>>
>>> It might speed turnround if I could test the deployed jars myself.
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: 23 January 2012 13:46
>>>> To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: Properties files in mavenised artifacts
>>>>
>>>> On 23 January 2012 13:08, Mark Collin <m...@ardescosolutions.com> wrote:
>>>>> Yes parent really does have to be a POM package.
>>>>
>>>> Bother.
>>>>
>>>> So we need another jar and another pom.
>>>>
>>>>> http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-pom.
>>>>> h
>>>>> t
>>>>> ml
>>>>>
>>>>> I've just tried using the latest 2.6-SNAPSHOT and I'm getting the
>>>>> following
>>>>> error:
>>>>
>>>> How are you using it?
>>>>
>>>>> [INFO]
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> --
>>>>> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
>>>>> [INFO]
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -- [INFO] Error building POM (may not be this project's POM).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Project ID: org.apache.jmeter:ApacheJMeter_core
>>>>>
>>>>> Reason: Parent:
>>>>> org.apache.jmeter:ApacheJMeter_parent:jar:2.6-SNAPSHOT
>>>>> of
>>>>> project: org.apache.jmeter:ApacheJMeter_core has wrong packaging: jar.
>>>>> Must be 'pom'. for project org.apache.jmeter:ApacheJMeter_core
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [INFO]
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -- [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch [INFO]
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> --
>>>>> [INFO] Total time: 12 seconds
>>>>> [INFO] Finished at: Mon Jan 23 13:03:50 GMT 2012 [INFO] Final Memory:
>>>>> 13M/107M [INFO]
>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> -
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com]
>>>>> Sent: 23 January 2012 12:15
>>>>> To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: Properties files in mavenised artifacts
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23 January 2012 12:03, Mark Collin <m...@ardescosolutions.com>
> wrote:
>>>>>> Thinking about it, I think I'm talking a degree of rubbish here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A parent needs to be packaged as a pom and not a jar so even if
>>>>>> you add a build section it's not going to work.  I think you will
>>>>>> instead need to have a new package that the parent depends on that
>>>>>> pulls in these
>>>>> extra files.
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently, the parent is now a jar package which contains the
>>>>> configuration files.
>>>>>
>>>>> The poms are basically just being used as jar descriptors and
>>>>> dependency declarations currently.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does the parent really have to be a pom package?
>>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone tried using one of the latest snapshots (i.e. one with
>>>>> ApacheJMeter_parent.jar as well as .pom)?
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Mark Collin [mailto:m...@ardescosolutions.com]
>>>>>> Sent: 23 January 2012 06:39
>>>>>> To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: RE: Properties files in mavenised artifacts
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The mvn deploy command should also build the package if the
>>>>>> <build> section exists in the POM so you could have a build
>>>>>> section for the parent POM that only pulls in resources that are
>>>>>> required (this would muddy the waters slightly but seems like the
>>>>>> pragmatic approach)
>>
>> --
>> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for
> the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete
> this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are
> notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in
> reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
>>
>> If you have received this email in error please notify
>> postmas...@ardescosolutions.com
>
> --
> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
> individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete 
> this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are 
> notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in 
> reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
>
> If you have received this email in error please notify 
> postmas...@ardescosolutions.com

Reply via email to