For me it's part of the new release.
Shouldn't it point to a valid nightly build ?

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:41 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 29 January 2012 12:42, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Nightly builds link points to a very old build(15 december) .
>
> Please start a new thread for a new subject.
>
> > Why not make it point to jenkins link until the issue with jenkins (from
> > what I remember it was that sebb ?)  is fixed ?
> >
> > Regards
> > Philippe
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 1:33 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> On 29 January 2012 10:36, Milamber <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Le 29/01/2012 01:56, sebb a ecrit :
> >> >>
> >> >>> All feedback (and votes!) welcome.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> [  ] +1  I support this release
> >> >>> [  ] +0  I am OK with this release
> >> >>> [  ] -0   OK, but....
> >> >>> [X] -1   I do not support this release (please indicate why)
> >> >>>
> >> >> Unfortunately some image files in the zip source file are corrupt -
> >> >> they were not excluded from the EOL conversion.
> >> >> I've fixed the build file - I think - but I need to do some more
> tests.
> >> >>
> >> >> There are also some files without the correct EOL endings; I'm fixing
> >> >> these shortly.
> >> >> Not actually a blocker, but might as well get them correct before
> >> creating RC2.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Please, tell me how to I can check is EOL is correct? (for next
> release)
> >>
> >> Hopefully soon, have to fix my SVN property script first.
> >>
> >> > Milamber
> >> >
> >> >> When creating RC2, please ensure this is done from a clean checkout
> of
> >> trunk.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Note: If the vote passes, the intention is to release the archive
> files
> >> >>> and rename the RC tag as the release tag.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Thanks in advance!
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Milamber
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cordialement.
> > Philippe Mouawad.
>



-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Reply via email to