On 29 January 2012 12:33, sebb <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 29 January 2012 10:36, Milamber <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 29/01/2012 01:56, sebb a ecrit :
>>>
>>>> All feedback (and votes!) welcome.
>>>>
>>>> [  ] +1  I support this release
>>>> [  ] +0  I am OK with this release
>>>> [  ] -0   OK, but....
>>>> [X] -1   I do not support this release (please indicate why)
>>>>
>>> Unfortunately some image files in the zip source file are corrupt -
>>> they were not excluded from the EOL conversion.
>>> I've fixed the build file - I think - but I need to do some more tests.
>>>
>>> There are also some files without the correct EOL endings; I'm fixing
>>> these shortly.
>>> Not actually a blocker, but might as well get them correct before creating 
>>> RC2.
>>>
>>
>> Please, tell me how to I can check is EOL is correct? (for next release)
>
> Hopefully soon, have to fix my SVN property script first.

I've fixed the script, and there don't seem to be any other missing
svn properties.

I also did a local distribution build and I think all the EOL issues are fixed.

There are still a few differences, but I think they are due to script
I use to convert the EOLs. In any case, the EOL differences don't look
significant.

So hopefully all is OK now to attempt RC2.

>> Milamber
>>
>>> When creating RC2, please ensure this is done from a clean checkout of 
>>> trunk.
>>>
>>>
>>>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>> Note: If the vote passes, the intention is to release the archive files
>>>> and rename the RC tag as the release tag.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>>
>>>> Milamber
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to