Let's be clear what this discussion is about.

JMeter already supports Groovy.
It's not a question of whether Groovy is a good scripting language.

The question is whether or not to bundle Groovy with JMeter.

The only advantage I can see is that JMeter users don't have to
download Groovy in order to use it.

The disadvantages are:
- additional download size, even if Groovy is not needed
- users will still have to download Groovy if there is a new version
and JMeter has not yet been updated.

It would be useful to know:
- what jars are needed?
- how large are they?

An alternative approach would be to provide a script to download Groovy.
This would solve both the disadvantages I mention.

We could even perhaps provide a template to download Groovy using JMeter.
This could be a useful sample for people to try.


On 23 February 2016 at 09:54, Milamber <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I think that is a very good idea to add Groovy to JMeter.
>
>
> On 22/02/2016 19:05, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> +1 for integration as of me.
>> Reasons:
>> - Make user experience as simple as possible (no need to bundle additional
>> libraries and manage configuration
>> -jsr223+groovy is the most performing option compared to beanshell
>> - as of the scripting I had to do, I always had at some step to script and
>> used this combination
>> - beanshell does not support java6/7/8 sugar syntax
>> - groovy is an easy scripting language with the full power of java + a lot
>> of additional features for xml, json manipulation, jmx ...
>> - Groovy is now Apache :)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On Monday, February 22, 2016, Pascal Schumacher <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> when this was last discussed, it was decided to wait till there is
>>> official Apache release (outside of Apache Incubator) of Groovy. Groovy
>>> 2.4.6 is the first release as a top level project and it was just
>>> released:
>>>
>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/groovy-users/201602.mbox/%3CCADQzvmnMENGU17_%3D9-_%3DnPDn9Ob3QsXC9iJHChT_zAWo0-CHJg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Pascal
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to