FYI BlazeMeter will attempt to implement this change and contribute it. Andrey Pokhilko
04.11.2017 17:06, Andrey Pokhilko пишет: > I'll need to think about it. > > Andrey Pokhilko > > 04.11.2017 17:01, Philippe Mouawad пишет: >> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Andrey Pokhilko <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 from me, I think it is possible to automatically move elements from >>> loaded test plans. >>> >> Do you have some time to contribute a patch for this if you think it's >> needed ? >> >>> Andrey Pokhilko >>> >>> 04.11.2017 15:18, Maxime Chassagneux пишет: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I never use it, except for recording script, so +1 for me. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> 2017-11-04 13:07 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad <[email protected] >>>> : >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> Workbench element is confusing for beginners who don't understand >>>>> clearly its use. >>>>> >>>>> Thinking more about it, I don't see today why we should still keep it. >>>>> >>>>> The only advantage of this element is Non Test Elements which would >>>>> be made available from Test Plan directly. >>>>> When running a test those element would not impact test plan. >>>>> >>>>> The only issue is backward compatibility, should we try to move >>> elements in >>>>> workbench under test plan or just mention a backward incompatibility. >>>>> >>>>> Users would manually move there elements to Test Plan. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>>
