Hello, I’d say Test Plan. I suggest testcompiler ignores them Regards
On Wednesday, November 8, 2017, Artem Fedorov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > If we dropped WorkBench, in which element we can add Non-Test Elements > (HTTP Mirror Server, HTTP(S) Test Script Recorder, Property Display)? > Can we add these Non-Test Elements to Test Plan (root) or Test Fragment? > > Thanks > > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> > Без > вирусов. www.avast.ru > <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_ > source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2> > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Philippe Mouawad < > [email protected] <javascript:;> > > wrote: > > > Great ! > > > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Andrey Pokhilko <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > FYI BlazeMeter will attempt to implement this change and contribute it. > > > > > > Andrey Pokhilko > > > > > > 04.11.2017 17:06, Andrey Pokhilko пишет: > > > > I'll need to think about it. > > > > > > > > Andrey Pokhilko > > > > > > > > 04.11.2017 17:01, Philippe Mouawad пишет: > > > >> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Andrey Pokhilko <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> +1 from me, I think it is possible to automatically move elements > > from > > > >>> loaded test plans. > > > >>> > > > >> Do you have some time to contribute a patch for this if you think > it's > > > >> needed ? > > > >> > > > >>> Andrey Pokhilko > > > >>> > > > >>> 04.11.2017 15:18, Maxime Chassagneux пишет: > > > >>>> Hi, > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I never use it, except for recording script, so +1 for me. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Regards > > > >>>> > > > >>>> 2017-11-04 13:07 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad < > > > [email protected] <javascript:;> > > > >>>> : > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Hello, > > > >>>>> Workbench element is confusing for beginners who don't understand > > > >>>>> clearly its use. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Thinking more about it, I don't see today why we should still > keep > > > it. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> The only advantage of this element is Non Test Elements which > would > > > >>>>> be made available from Test Plan directly. > > > >>>>> When running a test those element would not impact test plan. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> The only issue is backward compatibility, should we try to move > > > >>> elements in > > > >>>>> workbench under test plan or just mention a backward > > incompatibility. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Users would manually move there elements to Test Plan. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Regards > > > >>>>> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Cordialement. > > Philippe Mouawad. > > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad. Ubik-Ingénierie UBIK LOAD PACK Web Site <http://www.ubikloadpack.com/> UBIK LOAD PACK on TWITTER <https://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>
