sebb> But my reading of what you wrote was that master would be set to 5.1 sebb> at some point, i.e. it was not an atomic change of snapshot version.
I suggest an atomic update from 5.1-SNAPSHOT to 5.2-SNAPSHOT while 5.1 is there in the middle. I'm sure that closes the discussion. sebb>As already noted, I think it's going to be tricky to separate the two. Ok, I see your point. sebb>But we don't want any such branches to have any source code update It might still be useful for back-patching CVEs. Vladimir
