Am 11. Januar 2021 12:49:53 MEZ schrieb Milamber <[email protected]>:
>
>I can start the release process for 5.4.1 today?
That would be awesome
Felix
>
>On 09/01/2021 22:04, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>> Am 09.01.21 um 17:45 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>> Hello Felix,
>>> My answers inline below.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 4:28 PM Felix Schumacher
>>> <[email protected]
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 09.01.21 um 15:28 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> First best wishes for 2021 for all the team, I hope you're all
>>>> doing fine !
>>>>
>>>> Second, I think we should release a 5.4.1 now.
>>>> On my side I've been testing it for few days on Mac OSX and I
>>>> also made some tests on Windows, my colleague did it on Linux.
>>>>
>>>> The last bug on JTree due to Darklaf
>>>> (https://github.com/weisJ/darklaf/issues/228) was already
>there
>>>> in 5.3 and it's not that problematic.
>>>>
>>>> WDYT ?
>>> I would like to hear your opinion on the bugs 65053 and 65034.
>>>
>>> Bug 65053 is about downgrading JSONPath to 2.4.0 due to a bug
>with
>>> regex parsing. I think we could go back to 2.4.0 without
>loosing
>>> too much.
>>>
>>> Ok by me, sounds acceptable.
>>>
>>> Bug 65034 is about an old bug(?) in handling reading of
>>> binarytcpclient when no EOM is set. Those requests will always
>>> fail (at least in my tests). I think we should change the
>>> behaviour for the case when no EOM is given to not fail on
>>> SocketTimeoutException.
>>>
>>>
>>> I looked at your patch, it looks good to me. Thanks
>> Both committed.
>>
>> Felix
>>
>>> Apart from that, I am in favour of releasing soon (or even now
>:) )
>>>
>>> Felix
>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Philippe
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:27 PM Felix Schumacher
>>>> <[email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 11. Dezember 2020 12:16:09 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad
>>>> <[email protected]
><mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
>>>> >[email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe
>Mouawad <
>>>> >> [email protected]
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
>>>> >> >Hello,
>>>> >> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf
>upgrade ?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Which level do you want to achieve?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans
>>>> while working
>>>> >on the
>>>> >> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on
>>>> Ubuntu with
>>>> >Darklaf
>>>> >> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
>>>> >This is where I saw most of the bugs.
>>>> >I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do
>it
>>>> yet.
>>>>
>>>> I haven't tested yet on windows, but had planned it for
>the rc.
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
>>>>
>>>> I don't have that os :)
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >Looks a bit too early for me.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> How long should we calculate?
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and
>Windows,
>>>> what do
>>>> >you
>>>> >think ?
>>>>
>>>> I thought, that those tests could be done on the rc, but
>if
>>>> you want to have a bit more than the minimal testing that
>has
>>>> been performed by the reporters of the last issues (all
>>>> windows based I believe), then we should wait a bit more
>and
>>>> test actively on windows.
>>>>
>>>> Give us a shout, when you feel more comfortable with the
>>>> level of testing. I have no real pressure on this, Linux
>>>> seems to work great ;) in the mean time I will try to test
>on
>>>> windows, too.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Felix
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Regards
>>>> >> Felix
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >Thanks
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber
>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>>>> >wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>>>> >> >> > Hi all,
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give
>people
>>>> time for
>>>> >> >feedback on
>>>> >> >> > the last release.
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as
>RM?
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Regards
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Felix
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>>>> >> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>> >> >> >>> Hello,
>>>> >> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due
>to
>>>> some
>>>> >> >regressions
>>>> >> >> and
>>>> >> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
>>>> >> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release.
>I
>>>> would like
>>>> >to
>>>> >> >wait a
>>>> >> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported
>(not
>>>> weeks,
>>>> >> >though).
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly
>since
>>>> it was
>>>> >> >introduced
>>>> >> >> issues
>>>> >> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very
>>>> reactive to fix
>>>> >> >those
>>>> >> >> issues
>>>> >> >> >>> which is great.
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI
>>>> experience
>>>> >(at
>>>> >> >least
>>>> >> >> the
>>>> >> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not
>stable.
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
>>>> >> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect
>them.
>>>> And the
>>>> >> >manual
>>>> >> >> tests me
>>>> >> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
>>>> >> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only
>>>> sometimes on
>>>> >> >Windows 10.
>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>> >> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use
>it
>>>> for one
>>>> >> >customer,
>>>> >> >> this is
>>>> >> >> >>> how I reported them.
>>>> >> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more
>>>> automated
>>>> >tests
>>>> >> >for the
>>>> >> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving
>test
>>>> plans on a
>>>> >> >Windows
>>>> >> >> OS.
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing)
>GUI?
>>>> What would
>>>> >be
>>>> >> >a good
>>>> >> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic
>stuff
>>>> like
>>>> >opening
>>>> >> >a test
>>>> >> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
>>>> >> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we
>should
>>>> switch
>>>> >back
>>>> >> >to
>>>> >> >> System
>>>> >> >> >>> LAFs.
>>>> >> >> >> That is always possible.
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> Regards
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >> Felix
>>>> >> >> >>
>>>> >> >> >>> Regards
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cordialement.
>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cordialement.
>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>>>
