Hi,
I will prepare the RC2 today
Milamber
On 23/04/2022 11:02, Felix Schumacher wrote:
What about trying an RC2 of JMeter 5.5?
I updated our dependencies and added a workaround for the UI problem.
Felix
Am 18.03.22 um 17:35 schrieb Milamber:
Ready for RC2? (I think that no?)
cc @Vladimir
On 16/03/2022 22:42, UBIK LOAD PACK Support wrote:
Hello,
Looks good to me.
Let's do another RC with this.
Regards
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 6:30 PM Vladimir Sitnikov <
sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> wrote:
Could we make the setting java version dependant ?
By default, the setting would be commented in jmeter.properties.
Then, the code would use the appropriate default value according to
Java
version.
So I suggest changing
https://github.com/apache/jmeter/blob/53a992c8179f0f64fe1993df34bda6594856cf5e/src/jorphan/src/main/java/org/apache/jorphan/gui/ui/KerningOptimizer.java#L48
into something like maxLengthWithKerning = currentJava < 17 ? -1 :
10000;
Vladimir
ср, 16 мар. 2022 г. в 20:25, Philippe Mouawad <
p.moua...@ubik-ingenierie.com
:
Could we make the setting java version dependant ?
If it’s worth it as it will introduce additional config complexity
Regards
On Wednesday, March 16, 2022, Vladimir Sitnikov <
sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I would say, that my issue is not a regression and therefore
should be
not
a blocker.
There might be a regression like: "new setting caused activating
kerning
for texts smaller than 10K" (or whatever is the default).
So if previously the kerning was always disabled, the new option
might
unexpectedly activate it.
My assumption was that "it should not hurt since the text is only
10K",
however, in reality, it looks like even short texts cause slowness
for the old JDK.
So I'm inclined to make the default 0 (always disable kerning in
response
text areas) for Java <17.
WDYT?
Vladimir
--
Cordialement
Philippe M.
Ubik-Ingenierie