Felix
Am 28.04.22 um 10:43 schrieb Milamber:
Hi Philippe,Need to cancel RC2 for have a fix (or a rollback)? or i continue with the RC process?Milamber On 27/04/2022 11:23, Philippe Mouawad wrote:Hello,Sorry for late reply @Milamber <mailto:milambersp...@gmail.com> , I see you're releasing. I noticed a regression on Reporting that may be problematic, in the error tables, the assertion message takes precedence on error code which makes analysismore complex.It's a regression introduced by https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65885.Only when ignore status is checked should this happen. RegardsOn Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 10:13 AM Milamber <milam...@apache.org <mailto:milam...@apache.org>> wrote:Hi, I will prepare the RC2 today Milamber On 23/04/2022 11:02, Felix Schumacher wrote: > > What about trying an RC2 of JMeter 5.5? > > I updated our dependencies and added a workaround for the UI problem. > > Felix > > Am 18.03.22 um 17:35 schrieb Milamber: >> >> >> Ready for RC2? (I think that no?) >> cc @Vladimir >> >> On 16/03/2022 22:42, UBIK LOAD PACK Support wrote: >>> Hello, >>> Looks good to me. >>> Let's do another RC with this. >>> Regards >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 6:30 PM Vladimir Sitnikov < >>> sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com <mailto:sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>>>> Could we make the setting java version dependant ?>>>> By default, the setting would be commented in jmeter.properties.>>>> Then, the code would use the appropriate default value according to >>>> Java >>>> version. >>>> >>>> So I suggest changing >>>> >>>> https://github.com/apache/jmeter/blob/53a992c8179f0f64fe1993df34bda6594856cf5e/src/jorphan/src/main/java/org/apache/jorphan/gui/ui/KerningOptimizer.java#L48 >>>> >>>> >>>> into something like maxLengthWithKerning = currentJava < 17 ? -1 : >>>> 10000; >>>> >>>> Vladimir >>>> >>>> >>>> ср, 16 мар. 2022 г. в 20:25, Philippe Mouawad < >>>> p.moua...@ubik-ingenierie.com <mailto:p.moua...@ubik-ingenierie.com> >>>>> : >>>>> Could we make the setting java version dependant ? >>>>> If it’s worth it as it will introduce additional config complexity >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> On Wednesday, March 16, 2022, Vladimir Sitnikov < >>>>> sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com <mailto:sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> I would say, that my issue is not a regression and therefore >>>>>>> should be >>>>> not >>>>>> a blocker. >>>>>> >>>>>> There might be a regression like: "new setting caused activating >>>> kerning >>>>>> for texts smaller than 10K" (or whatever is the default). >>>>>> So if previously the kerning was always disabled, the new option >>>>>> might >>>>>> unexpectedly activate it. >>>>>> >>>>>> My assumption was that "it should not hurt since the text is only >>>>>> 10K", >>>>>> however, in reality, it looks like even short texts cause slowness >>>>>> for the old JDK. >>>>>> >>>>>> So I'm inclined to make the default 0 (always disable kerning in >>>> response >>>>>> text areas) for Java <17. >>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>> >>>>>> Vladimir >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Cordialement >>>>> Philippe M. >>>>> Ubik-Ingenierie >>>>> >>> >> -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
OpenPGP_0xEA6C3728EA91C4AF.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
