Given the community-over-code meme, incubator graduation is more about the people than the code :)
So I'm more interested in your roadmap being discussed and consensus existing, than on how many releases are done etc. I like your proposed roadmap and it seems like nice timing on request-for-graduation. Hen On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 2:44 AM, Matt Post <p...@cs.jhu.edu> wrote: > My thinking on that roadmap was a comment Lewis made a while ago about > incubator graduation being judged by the number of releases. If you think > we can get out sooner, then I'm all for it! Maybe we can get the docker > containers out and then push for it after that? > > I like your idea about a more concerted advertising effort. We could also > try to pull together a demo paper for ACL <http://acl2017.org/> which is > due in February. I think I might have a hook that would appeal to reviewers > there. > > > > On Nov 17, 2016, at 2:12 AM, Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Sounds good :) > > > > My basic mantra is 'get the summary page all signed off, then start > asking > > "when graduate?"'. Projects can tend to linger in the Incubator awaiting > > perfection. > > > > I wonder how you could take the 3rd item (Linux.com article) and make > that > > bigger. Perhaps encourage every committer to write a blog post so you end > > up with the article as an intro, and then each committer's blog entry or > > website hosted article as a personal "how I got into this" or "what I > work > > on" or "a commit I recently did, a commit I keep meaning to getting > around > > to working on". Random thought :) > > > > Hen > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Matt Post <p...@cs.jhu.edu> wrote: > > > >> We're still waiting on our first software release, so it seems to me a > bit > >> premature to graduate? Though I don't know how these decisions are made > — > >> what goes into it? > >> > >> Here is the roadmap that I have in mind: > >> > >> - 6.1 release (imminent) > >> - Large-scale release of language packs (imminent) > >> - Linux.com article introducing people to MT, Joshua, language packs, > and > >> adding custom rules > >> - Release of docker-based language packs (including KenLM) > >> - 7.0 release (spring) > >> - Graduate > >> > >> If we keep that rough schedule, we'll have incubated a year and have a > lot > >> to show for it. > >> > >> matt > >> > >> > >>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> Thanks :) > >>> > >>> Reason for asking being that it felt that the standard checklist things > >>> were complete and I was wondering what the path to graduation is? > >>> > >>> Any reason not to start thinking about a vote? > >>> > >>> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 04:02 Matt Post <p...@cs.jhu.edu> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Thanks, Lewis, and Henri, for pointing this out. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Nov 15, 2016, at 1:18 AM, lewis john mcgibbney < > lewi...@apache.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Henri, > >>>>> I just pushed the update to SVN. Should update asynch reasonably > soon. > >>>>> > >>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/joshua.html > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 1:22 PM, < > >>>>> dev-digest-h...@joshua.incubator.apache.org> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> From: Henri Yandell <bay...@apache.org> > >>>>>> To: dev@joshua.incubator.apache.org > >>>>>> Cc: > >>>>>> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 01:17:57 -0800 > >>>>>> Subject: Updating Incubator summary > >>>>>> Would be useful to update this page: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/joshua.html > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Are there any of the checklist items that are still open? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> As far as I am aware.... no :) > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >
